Davidson v. Advisory of Civil (The Court) N.Y.C. to Cause Prejudice
| William Davidson |
| Advisory of Civil (The Court) N.Y.C. to Cause Prejudice |
| 8:2010cv01397 |
| November 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Plattsburgh Office |
| Clinton |
| David N. Hurd |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
DECISION & ORDER accepting and adopting Magistrate Judge Treece's 9 Report and Recommendations; that the amended complaint is DISMISSED; the action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and the Clerk is directed to serve the pltf with a copy of this Order and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/9/2011. (see)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER accepting and adopting in all respects Magistrate Judge Treece's 4 Report and Recommendations; The action is DISMISSED; however Plaintiff is afforded the opportunity to amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this orde r. The amended complaint must be consistent with the instructions given in the Report-Recommendation, must comply with Rules 8 and 10 of Fed. R. Civ. P. and any other terms the court deems proper. Plaintiff must also allege claims of misconduct or wr ongdoing against defendant that he has a legal right to pursue and over which this court has jurisdiction; In the event plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, the complaint will be DISMISSED in its entirety without further order of this court; and The Clerk is directed to serve the plaintiff with a copy of this order. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/6/2011. (see)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT - RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER re 1 Complaint and 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by William Davidson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed with this action In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS RE COMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with FRCP 8 and 10. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that in light of Plaintiff's pro se status, prior to any dismissal, Plaintiff be afforded the opportunity to amend h is Complaint consistent with the instructions above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order on Plaintiff by certified mail. Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2011. Case Review Deadline 1/12/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 12/22/2010. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davidson v. Advisory of Civil (The Court) N.Y.C. to Cause Prejudice | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Davidson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advisory of Civil (The Court) N.Y.C. to Cause Prejudice | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
