Decayette v. Goord et al
| 9:2006cv00783 |
| June 23, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| George H. Lowe |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER that summary judgment be granted dismissing all claims against Defendants Goord, Allard, Berry, Meeks, Martin, and Sugg. ORDERED that summary judgment be granted dismissing the Eighth Amendment claim of inadequate medical care against Defendan t Volpe. ORDERED that Defendant Volpe's motion for summary judgment be denied as to the Eighth Amendment claim of failure to intervene. The case shall proceed to trial against Defendant Volpe on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of failur e to intervene, against Defendants Schewnki and Roberts on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims of excessive force, and against Defendants Schewnki andRoberts on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claims. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/8/09. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Decayette v. Goord et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
