Jackson v. Auburn Correctional Facility et al
| Anthony Jackson |
| Auburn Correctional Facility, H.D. Graham, D. Cooper, R. Heffron and C. Parmiter |
| 9:2007cv00651 |
| June 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Cayuga |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| David E. Peebles |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER that 33 Report and Recommendations is adopted. ORDERED that plaintiff''s IFP status is VACATED, in the event that plaintiff does not submit the $350.00 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this Order, the complaint will be dismissed without further order of the court. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/15/09. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDED, that 4 Order granting plaintiff's IFP status be VACATED. RECOMMENDED, that, Plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED as to all defendants and all claims unless, within thirty days after the entry of a final o rder by District Judge Hurd addressing this recommendation, plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $350.00. Objections to R&R due by 5/22/2009 Case Review Deadline 5/28/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 5/8/09. (Report and Recommendations served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
