Caldwell v. Doe et al
Corey Caldwell |
John Doe, Gettmann, J. Stout and Department of Correctional Services |
9:2009cv00580 |
May 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
Franklin |
David N. Hurd |
David E. Peebles |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 DECISION AND ORDER: Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 42 ) is accepted in whole. ORDERED, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 32 ) is GRANTED. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to file a judgment dismissing the complaint and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/3/12. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, ) |
Filing 24 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17 ) is GRANTED, in part. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's claims for negligence are DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's claims for medical indiffere nce, including all claims against defendant J. Stout, are DISMISSED with leave to replead. ORDERED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss otherwise is DENIED. ORDERED, the file is returned to the Magistrate Judge for any further proceedings. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/27/10. (Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.