Artis v. Adam et al
| Clarence L. Artis, Jr. |
| Adam, Patricia Kleinsmith, Conners, Hill, Biggs, John Doe, Smolynsk, Harder and Joseph Jellick |
| 9:2010cv00427 |
| April 12, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Broome |
| George H. Lowe |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER accepting and adopting Magistrate Judge Dancks' # 54 Report-Recommendation in its entirety; and granting in part and denying in part # 46 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, such that all of Plaintiff' ;s claims are dismissed, EXCEPT for his excessive force claim against Defendants Jellick and Valls regarding the incident of 3/15/10. It is further ORDERED that Pro Bono Counsel be appointed for the Plaintiff for purposes of trial only; any appeal s hall remain the responsibility of the plaintiff alone unless a motion for appointment of counsel for an appeal is granted; and it is further ORDERED that upon assignment of Pro Bono Counsel, a final pretrial conference with counsel will be scheduled in this action, at which time the Court will schedule a jury trial. Counsel are directed to appear at the final pretrial conference with settlement authority from the parties. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/25/12. (lmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
