Allah v. Karandy et al
| Khalaire Allah |
| David Karandy, Janet Collins, Switz, B. McArdle, B. Hilton, John Doe, Khan, Lisa Kalis, Makuch, Mark Bradt, Michelle Artus, Hues, C. Robinson, Gerry Kania, J. Rao, Vance Hawley, M. Sheahan, M. Thoms, Kristian Salotti, Carrol, Cheasman, LeVac, Scott Ryan, Diane L. VanBuren, Carl J. Koenigsmann and Michael Hogan |
| 9:2013cv00826 |
| July 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Washington |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
JUDGMENT in favor of B. Hilton, Diane L. VanBuren against Khalaire Allah. (Copy served upon Pltf via regular mail) (bjw, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER: ORDERS that Defendants Hilton and Van Buren's motion for reconsideration, see Dkt. No. 76 , is DENIED. ORDERS that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Dancks to address Plaintiff's letter motion regarding mediation/settlement, see Dkt. No. 79 . Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 3/12/19. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Dancks' May 9, 2016 Order and Report-Recommendation, see Dkt. No. 65 , is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No . 54 , is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Khan, Hilton, and Van Buren. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 54 , is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's Fourte enth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Hilton and Van Buren insofar as those claims relate to imposition of restraints and the jumpsuit. ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 54 , is DENIED with re gard to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Hilton and Van Buren insofar as those claims relate to Draft Directive No. 4939. ORDERS that this case is now trial ready and the Court will issue a trial order in due course. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 3/31/17.{order and consent form served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERS that, as a result of the Court's sua sponte reconsideration of that portion of the July 2014 Order that states that the Clerk of the Court shall forward summonses, along with copies of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon Defendants Khan, Hilton, and VanBuren, see July 2014 Order at 31, the aforesaid portion of the July 2014 Order is amended as set forth below; and the Court further ORDERS that, upon Plaintiff's submi ssion of a renewed IFP Application or request for assistance with service of process, the Clerk of the Court shall return the file to the Court for further consideration; and the Court further ORDERS that, if Plaintiff does not submit an IFP Applic ation or a request for assistance with service of process within twenty (20) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall forward the summonses to Plaintiff, who shall be responsible for effecting ser vice of process on Defendants Hilton, Khan, and VanBuren; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum- Decision and Order on Plaintiff, together with a blank In Forma Pauperis Application. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 7/30/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail with a blank In Forma Pauperis Application)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
