Gomez et al v. Tedford et al
| Santiago Gomez and Michael Gonzalez |
| Jeffrey Tedford, D. Perryman, Jeffrey Cotter, Paul Woodruff and J. Payton |
| 9:2014cv01476 |
| December 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Franklin |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that the Court ACCEPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83 ] for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt. # 69 ] is GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/12/18. {order served via regular and certified mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
|
Filing
49
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 45 Report and Recommendation is adopted. The Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is accepted for filing as to Plaintiff Gomez's First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Perryman and Woodruff ; All other claims are hereby DISMISSED; Plaintiff Gonzalez is hereby DISMISSED from the action; Defendants Tedford, Cotter, and Payton are hereby DISMISSED from the action; and the stay of Defendants' deadline to answer the Amended Complaint is hereby LIFTED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/17/16. {order served via regular mail on plaintiffs}(nas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
