Keyes v. Apple
| Keyes |
| Apple |
| Mitchell Keyes |
| Craig D. Apple |
| 9:2016cv01111 |
| September 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Albany |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Decision and Order of the Honorable Judge Mae A. D'Agostino, dated the 19th day of September, 2016. (served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing 2
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that IFP status is granted for the limited purpose of filing the petition, and the petition, Dkt. No. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. The Court makes no determination regarding the merits of any of the claims raised in the petition. ORDERED that no Certificate of Appealability ("COA") shall issue because petitioner failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" as 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) requires. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/19/16. (served on petitioner by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mitchell Keyes. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Resident Account History Report, #3 Envelope) (alh, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
