Brown v. Phipps et al
| Melvin Brown |
| R. Barnofsky, O'Connor, Phipps, Melnick, Johnson, A. Pierce, Erlwein and J. Gonzalez |
| 9:2019cv00331 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New York Northern has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:19-cv-04356, filed 05/14/2019. (nas) |
Filing 11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court advise the Clerk of the Southern District of New York of the entry of this Order and provide all information necessary for the Clerk of the Southern District to electronically access the documents filed in this action. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 5/9/2019. (Order mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar)
|
| Filing 10 Letter from Brown asking for status of case.(Clerk provided plaintiff with a copy of the docket sheet.) (rar) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Melvin Brown. Effective Date 4/18/2019. Old Address: Upstate Correctional Facility; New Address: Clinton Correctional Facility. (rar) |
| Filing 8 Letter from Brown asking if the court received IFP. (Clerk mailed a docket report to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar, ) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by District Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 4/2/2019. (Text Order mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar) Modified to show District Judge authorizing Text Order on 4/3/2019 (rar, ).
|
| Filing 6 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Melvin Brown. (rar, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Melvin Brown. (rar) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility. ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/20/2019. (Order and blank IFP Application mailed to plaintiff by regular mail). (rar)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Melvin Brown. (rar, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Melvin Brown. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (rar, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. Barnofsky, Erlwein, J. Gonzalez, Johnson, Melnick, O'Connor, Phipps, A. Pierce filed by Melvin Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 envelope) (rar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
