Riley v. CCS Medical Department et al
| Tony D. Riley |
| CCS Medical Department, Dep. O'Connor and Dep. Egan |
| 9:2019cv01450 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: Regarding the #5 Decision and Order sent to Tony D. Riley at the Onondaga County Justice Center. Return to Sender - Attempted Not Known - Unable to Forward. (meb) |
| Filing 5 DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #3 ) is DENIED as incomplete; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff must, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or (2) submit a signed inmate authorization form consenting to pay $350.00 over time; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff timely complies with this Decision and Order, the file in this matter shall be returned to the Court for further review. If plaintiff sends in a signed inmate authorization form, the Court will sua sponte reconsider the IFP Application (Dkt. No. #3 ) that plaintiff previously submitted; and it is further ORDERED that in the event that plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Decision and Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice, without further Order of this Court. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/16/2019. (Copy served via regular mail, along with blank forms)(meb) |
| Set Deadlines: Notice of Compliance Deadline 1/16/2020 Case Review Deadline 2/18/2020 (meb, ) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/4/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tony D. Riley.(meb) |
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: It is hereby ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application; and it is further ORDERED that, in the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules; and it is further ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/25/2019. (Copy served via regular mail, along with blank forms)(meb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against CCS Medical Department, Egan, O'Connor filed by Tony D. Riley. (Mailing envelope included)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
