Elleby v. United States et al
| Taye Elleby and Taye L. Elleby |
| Sgt. Superknot, United States, John Doe, C.O. J. Senecal, C.O. John/Jane Doe, Sgt. Martingano and Lt. Peachtree |
| 9:2020cv00693 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. ORDERED that, in the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 6/23/2020. {order and blank forms served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against John Doe, John/Jane Doe, Sgt. Martingano, Peachtree, J. Senecal, Superknot, United States filed by Taye Elleby.(nas, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
