Williams v. Riverview Correctional Facility et al
Plaintiff: Lacey Williams
Defendant: J. LaRose, Sgt. Auol, MJ Hogler, Riverview Correctional Facility and Fifield
Case Number: 9:2021cv00276
Filed: March 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: Gary L Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2021 Filing 11 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the May 14, 2021 Decision and Order of Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe.{judgment served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)
May 14, 2021 Filing 10 Notification to Superintendent of Filing - Provided Superintendent at Riverview Correctional Facility with notice of instant action and a copy of Plaintiff's #3 Inmate Authorization Form. USDC/NYND Finance Dept notified. [copy served on plaintiff](nas, )
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, except that any claims asserted against Riverview Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) and 1915A(b)(2) as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. ORDERED that, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must file an amended complaint as directed within thirty (30) days from the filing date of this Decision andOrder. ORDERED that, if plaintiff timely files a proper amended complaint, this matter be returned to the Court for further review. ORDERED that, if plaintiff fails to timely file a proper amended complaint as directed, the Clerk shall enter judgment indicating that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice without further order of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In that event, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/14/2021. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
April 13, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lacey Williams. (nas, )
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's Second IFP Application (Dkt. No. #5 ) is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that plaintiff must, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full, or (2) submit an IFP application which has been completed and signed by him and which has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility. ORDERED that, in the event plaintiff fails to timely comply with the filing fee requirements set forth in this Decision and Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice without further Order of this Court and the Clerk shall close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/31/2021. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
March 31, 2021 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Notice of Compliance Deadline 4/30/2021 Case Review Deadline 6/1/2021 (nas, )
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/17/2021. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
March 17, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lacey Williams. (nas, )
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/12/2021. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
March 10, 2021 Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Lacey Williams. (nas, )
March 10, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lacey Williams(nas, )
March 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sgt. Auol, MJ Hogler, J. LaRose, Riverview Correctional Facility; Sgt. Fifield filed by Lacey Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 envelope)(nas ) Modified on 3/15/2021 to include Fifield. (nas, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Riverview Correctional Facility et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. LaRose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Auol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MJ Hogler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverview Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fifield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lacey Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?