Gagnon v. Alkermes plc et al
Nancy Gagnon |
Alkermes plc, Richard F. Pop and James M. Frates |
1:2017cv09178 |
November 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
William H. Pauley |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER denying 56 Motion for Reconsideration. For the foregoing reasons, Local 731's motion for partial reconsideration is denied. Because Local 731 has not demonstrated that reconsideration of its Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claim is war ranted, this Court also leaves its dismissal of the Section 20(a) claim untouched. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 56 and mark this case as closed. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 7/2/2019) (js) |
Filing 54 OPINION & ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, as this Court previously informed t he parties during pre-motion proceedings that leave to replead would not be granted if Defendants prevailed on this motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 36 and 41 and mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 3/28/2019) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. Modified on 3/28/2019 (jwh). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.