Malletier v. Carducci Leather Fashions, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv00497
Filed: January 22, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: John F. Keenan
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 25 Report and Recommendations. Having received no objections, and finding no clear error, I hereby confirm and adopt the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Louis Vuitton is awarded judgment against Bonini in the amount of $405,568.14, consisting of $400,000 in statutory damages and $5,568.14 in attorneys' fees and costs. This case is closed. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 8/19/09) (tro) Modified on 9/8/2009 (ae).
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE HONORABLE JOHN F. KEENAN, I now recommend that Louis Vuitton be awarded judgment against Bonini in the amount of $405,568.14, consisting of $400,000 in statutory damages and attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $5,568.14. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 7/21/09) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(pl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malletier v. Carducci Leather Fashions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?