Smith v. The City of New York et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv03286
Filed: April 29, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 78 OPINION. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial is denied. Re: 72 MOTION for New Trial filed by Levon Smith. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/28/2012) (rjm)
August 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 OPINION; for the reasons outlined herein, defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is granted and plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment is denied. This opinion resolves the motions listed as document numbers 19 and 2 5 in this case: Doc.#19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Behalf of Defendants. Document filed by The City of New York, Jorge Tobon; Heribert Bermudez, James South. Responses due by 2/1/2010(Smith, Qiana)Doc.#25 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Levon Smith.(Okoli, Kenechukwu) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/27/10) (sac)
May 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material.... (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 5/29/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?