Ross et al v. Bank of America N.A. (USA) et al
1:2005cv07116 |
August 11, 2005 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Anti-Trust Office |
William H. Pauley |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1 Antitrust Litigation |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 276 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court assumes that Discover's counsel will re-review its privilege log to ensure that any documents identical or similar to the documents described above as containing business advice, are produced to Plaintiffs. Discovery properly invoked the attorney-client privilege with respect to the other documents that have been reviewed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 11/3/2010) (jpo) |
Filing 111 ORDER: The March 31, 2009 deadline for asserting additional causes of action or claims or prayers for relief, as stated in paragraph 1 of this Court's Scheduling Order of March 9, 2009, is reset to April 6, 2009. No pre-motion letter is required in connection with any filing on this revised deadline, or with respect to any other filing as to which a deadline was established in paragraph 1 of this Court's Scheduling Order. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 3/30/2009) (jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ross et al v. Bank of America N.A. (USA) et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.