Figueroa v. NYC Department of Sanitation
Case Number: 1:2005cv09594
Filed: November 14, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Debra C. Freeman
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 137 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:#101010 The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, C&B's motion for a charging lien is granted in the amount of $60,745.29. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/11/2011) (mro) Modified on 11/15/2011 (jab).
August 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 132 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 117 MOTION for Attorney Fees, filed by Marilyn C. Figueroa. For the reasons discussed within, C&B's motion for a charging lien is granted. C&B should submit an affidavit as described above by August 10, 2011, and the plaintiff may submit an affidavit in response by August 17, 2011. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 117. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/3/2011) (ab)
February 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #99896 For reasons further set forth in said Order, the defendants' motion to enforce the settlement agreement is granted. The defendantshould submit a proposed judgment consistent with this opinion by February 7, 2011. The plaintiff can submit any counter-judgment by February 14, 2011. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 83. 83 MOTION to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/31/11) (db) Modified on 2/2/2011 (ajc).
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Therefore, the motion by the plaintiff's counsel to withdraw is granted. The motion by the plaintiff's counsel for a retaining lien and a charging lien is denied without prejudice to renewal after the decision on the motion to enforce the purported settlement agreement. The plaintiff may oppose the motion to enforce either pro se or by a new attorney. The opposition to the motion to enforce the settlement agreement must be filed by November 15, 2010. Any reply must be filed by November 29, 2010. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 82. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/20/2010) (jpo)
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Therefore, the motion by the plaintiff's counsel to withdraw is granted. The motion by the plaintiff's counsel for a retaining lien and a charging lien is denied without prejudice to renewal after the decision on the motion to enforce the purported settlement agreement. The plaintiff may oppose the motion to enforce either pro se or by a new attorney. The opposition to the motion to enforce the settlement agreement must be filed by November 15, 2010. Any reply must be filed by November 29, 2010. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 82. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/20/2010) (jpo)
May 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER, for the reasons stated on the record at the conference held on 5/28/09, plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. To the extent that the plaintiff has requested the return of her $10,000 retainer payment, that applica tion is denied....This action is stayed for 30 days... the joint pretrial order, proposed voir dire, and proposed jury instructions shall be submitted by 7/31/09. The parties shall be ready for trial on 48 hours notice on or after 8/14/09. ( Pretrial Order due by 7/31/2009. Ready for Trial by 8/14/2009.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/29/09) (cd)
May 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER: The Court has received the attached affidavit from the plaintiff which it transmits to counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants. The Court also notes that plaintiff's counsel did not serve his affirmation upon defense counsel but rather filed it under seal with the Court. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/14/2009) (jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Figueroa v. NYC Department of Sanitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?