Five Borough Bicycle Club et al v. The City of New York et al
| Five Borough Bicycle Club, Sharon Blythe, Josh Gosciak, Kenneth T. Jackson, Madeline Nelson, Elizabeth Shura and Luke Son |
| The City of New York, Raymond Kelly, James Tuller, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2007cv02448 |
| March 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
OPINION: #98553 As I wrote in ruling on the preliminary injunction, I am sympathetic to plaintiffs concerns. In certain circumstances, the Parade Regulations may impose inconveniences on plaintiffs ability to ride their bicycles through the streets o f our City with unfettered freedom. And if this lawsuit is any measure, the tension that has existed between the NYPD and MCM has not much dissipated in the years since the Courts first ruling. But, after careful review of all of the evidence in this case, the Court remains persuaded that the Parade Regulations themselves, and the NYPDs enforcement of them and other relevant statutes, does not run afoul of the Constitution. Accordingly, the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The foregoing constitute the Courts findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/16/2010) (jpo) Modified on 2/17/2010 (ajc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
