Amerex Group, Inc. et al v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
Amerex Group, Inc. and Amerex USA Inc. |
Lexington Insurance Company, Ace USA and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
1:2007cv03259 |
April 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Harold Baer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 OPINION & ORDER #99517 that Defendants' Motion to Confirm the Appraisal Award is hereby GRANTED. The amount of Amerex's losses and expenses is significantly less than the amount of the insurance payment received by Amerex; therefore, there is no further relief for Plaintiff to seek, and the case must be closed. The Clerk of Court is instructed to remove this matter from my docket. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 9/24/10) (cd) Modified on 10/4/2010 (ajc). |
Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Confirm the Appraisal Award is hereby GRANTED. The amount of Amerex's losses and expenses is significantly less than the amount ofthe insurance payment already received by Amerex; therefore, there is no further relief for Plaintiff to seek, and the case must be closed. The Clerk of Court is instructed to remove this matter from my docket. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 9/24/2010) (jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.