Johnson v. Killian et al
||J. Killian and Rabbi Laskin
||July 24, 2007
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Laura Taylor Swain
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Prison Condition
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 9, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 80 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, we grant the defendants motion (docket no. 80) in its entirety. We further certify that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 1/8/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (lmb)
|June 23, 2009
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration...However, in reading the Court's opinion of 4/21/09, we have observed some inconsistencies between the body of the opinion and the conclusory paragraph. Accordingly, the conclusion is a mended to read: For the foregoing reasons, all of plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice, except for plaintiff Johnson's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Wynkoop' and plaintiffs' cross-motion is denied. ....We also withdraw the reference to Magistrate Judge Eaton and provide that all pretrial discovery shall be concluded by 9/15/09. Dispositive motions, if any, should be submitted no later than 10/15/09. In the absence of the submission of a dispositive motion by 10/15/09, this case will be considered ready for trial. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 6/22/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd)
|April 21, 2009
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97433, granting re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Rabbi Laskin, D. Wynkoop, J. Killian and plaintiffs' cross-motion is denied, and only Plaintiff Johnson's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defenda nt Wynkoop, in her individual and official capacity, remains in this action. The following claims are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to replead: all RFRA and First Amendment prayer policy claims against Defendant Killian and Laskin, as fu rther set forth in this document....The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate Docket Entry No. 24, and terminate Plaintiffs Pandy, Burks, Counts, Fernand, Harge, Stevens, Taylor and Washington and Defendants Killian and Laskin in connection with the caption of this case. All settlement and pretrial management issued continue to be referred to Magistrate Judge Eaton. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/21/09) (cd) Modified on 4/22/2009 (mro).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?