Tavelex Canada Limited v. Morbey et al
| Tavelex Canada Limited |
| Leighanna Morbey and Afex-Associated Foreign Exchange, Inc. |
| 1:2007cv09747 |
| November 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| George B. Daniels |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER on or about November 2, 2007, Travelex initiated a law suite by Order to Show Cause against Morbey and AFEX for, inter alia, breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, and unfair competition, and sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction the parties wish to avoid the cost in time and resources of a protracted litigation and now desire to resolve all of the claims and controversies among them relating to the Litigation and, as part thereof, to provide for certain agreements upon certain terms and conditions; in consideration of the respective agreements, covenants and promised contained herein and the actions be taken by the parties hereto, the sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as stated in this order. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 2/25/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 02/25/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
