Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al
| 1:2007cv11201 |
| December 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER: As reflected at a conference held today, and on consent of defendant Christopher Watson, the application for relief made by Order to Show Cause filed June 17, 2009 (Docket # 86) is deemed withdrawn. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 9/24/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER, that this action shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein for all further proceedings. Status Conference reset for 7/8/2009 at 04:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/2/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION & ORDER #97030 that the Report is adopted in part, and the 8/18/08 and 9/2/08 cross-motions to enforce the settlement are denied in part and granted in part. (attached is the proposed settlement judgment) (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 2/3/09) (cd) Modified on 2/5/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
