Maccharulo v. Gleen Goord et al.
| Joy Maccharulo and Delores Kucharczyk |
| Glenn Goord, Michael Hogan, Donald Sawyer, Robert Rizzo, William Connelly, John Doe and James Doe |
| 1:2008cv00301 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Kimba M. Wood |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #99210 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' ADA Title II and Rehabilitation Act claims against DOCS, OMH, and CNYPC are dismissed. This Order resolves docket entry no. 29. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/21/2010) (jfe) Modified on 7/22/2010 (ajc).
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER:#97901 For the reasons set forth herein, all Section 1983 claims against the State of New York, DOCS, OMH, CNYPC, and/or state officials in their official capacity are dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter j urisdiction. All claims against Defendants Burge, Phillips, Colella, Hermann, Miller, Dr. Langbart, Henderson, Dr. Kami, Dr. Klein, Vito, Churns, Croce, Roberts, Correctional Officer Miller, Belanger, and Muetzel are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) as untimely. All claims against Defendants Phillips, Fishkill Nurse Homell or Howell, Fishkill Nurse 407, Furrorn, Nelson, Lopiccolo, and Thomas are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for fa ilure to make timely service. The Section 1983 claim against Defendant Rizzo and the ADA Title II and Rehabilitation Act claims against Defendant Mazzuca are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs ADA Title II and Rehabilitati on Act claims against DOCS, OHM, CNYPC, and the State of New York are dismissed with leave to replead. Any Second Amended Complaint repleading claims against the Entity Defendants must be filed by September 4, 2009. Failure to file such a timely amen ded pleading will result in the dismissal of the claims against the Entity Defendant with prejudice, without further advance notice to Plaintiffs. This Order resolves docket entry no. 18. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/14/09) (tro) Modified on 8/17/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
