World Trade Center Properties, L.L.C. et al v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
World Trade Center Properties, L.L.C., 2 World Trade Center, L.L.C. and 4 World Trade Center, L.L.C. |
United Airlines, Inc., UAL Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, Massachusetts Port Authority, The Boeing Company, Delta Airlines, Inc., Delta Express, Inc., Midway Airlines Corporation, Huntleigh USA Corporation, ICTS International, N.V., Globe Aviation Services Corporation, Burns International Security Services Corporation, Burns International Sevices Corporation, Pinkerton's, Inc. and Securitas AB |
1:2008cv03719 |
April 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Other Statutory Actions Office |
Albany |
Alvin K. Hellerstein |
Both |
Federal Question |
49:40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 227 ORDER AND OPINION CONSTRUING WTCP LEASES AND REGULATING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: This opinion follows remand by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and construes the relevant provisions of the four identical net leases (the "Lease") for Buildin gs One, Two, Three, and Four of the World Trade Center, destroyed on September 11, 2001 by terrorist-related aircraft crashes. My interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Lease shall provide the parameters by which the parties' experts should express their opinions as to the values of the the leaseholds immediately following their destruction on September 11, 2001. (As further set forth in the order). A status conference will be held on April 25, 2017, at 2:30 p.m., to hear the pa rties' comments and to regulate further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Any written submissions are due by April 20, 2017. (Status Conference set for 4/25/2017 at 02:30 PM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 4/6/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-mc-00101-AKH, 1:08-cv-03719-AKH, 1:08-cv-03722-AKH(cla) |
Filing 164 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CREDIT INSURANCE RECOVERIES AGAINST POTENTIAL TORT RECOVERIES: Defendants' motion to credit insurance recoveries against potential tort recoveries is denied. The issue is not suitable for summary disposition o n the record presented. The clerk shall terrninate the motions (08 Civ. 3719, Doc. No. 153; 08 Civ. 3722, Doc. No. 169). (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 8/31/2012) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-mc-00101-AKH, 1:08-cv-03719-AKH, 1:08-cv-03722-AKH(ft) |
Filing 90 AMENDED ORDER AND OPINION RESOLVING INTERVENOR'S MOTION TO UNSEAL DOCUMENTS: For the reasons discussed in this Opinion, the Times' motion is granted in part and denied in part. The aggregate amount of the settlement and its allocation among contributing insurers shall be disclosed to the public. The allocation of settlement proceeds among the settling plaintiffs as well as confidential documents exchanged in the course of damages discovery, settlement negotiations and mediation shall r emain under seal. By July 14, 2010, the parties shall submit redacted versions, complying with this Order, of all papers submitted in connection with the motion for approval of the settlement, including the transcript of the May 27,2010 oral argument on the motion. The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 1164) as terminated. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 7/1/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-mc-00101-AKH, 1:08-cv-03719-AKH, 1:08-cv-03722-AKH(jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.