Stanacard, L.L.C. v. Rebtel Networks, AB et al
||Rebtel Networks, AB and Rebtel Mobile, Inc.
||May 23, 2008
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Robert W. Sweet
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 6, 2010
OPINION: #98436 denying and the disputed claim terms are given the definitions set forth in this opinion re: 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment NOTICE OF REBTELS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE 156 PATENT DUE TO INDEFINITENESS, filed by Rebtel Networks, AB, Rebtel Mobile, Inc. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 1/5/10) (cd) Modified on 1/8/2010 (ajc).
|August 28, 2009
ORDER: It is hereby ordered that the attorneys named herein are authorized to bring certain electronic equipment as described herein, into the Courthouse for use in the action. The proceeding is anticipated to begin on September 2, 2009 and conclude on September 2, 2009. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/25/2009) (jpo)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?