Vynar v. 4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Mykhaylo Vynar
Defendant: 4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation, One Wall Street Holdings L.L.C. and The Bank of New York Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv06809
Filed: July 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Alvin K. Hellerstein
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER AND OPINION APPROVING SETTLEMENTS IN 82 CASES re: (5859 in 1:21-mc-00102-AKH) MOTION to Approve Settlement and Legal Fees filed by Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow. Plaintiffs' motion to approve the settlements is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 5859) terminated. The approved settlement results in the resolution of all the claims brought by 81 of the 82 settling plaintiffs. Accordingly, the Clerk shall dismiss with prejudice the Complaints of the 81 plaintiffs and close the cases listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, subject to restoration by any party in the event settlement is not finalized. The sole remaining plaintiff, Antoni Lysomirski, has settled with most, but not all, defendants agains t whom he filed claims. The settling and non-settling defendants in Lysomirski's case are identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto. The Clerk shall dismiss with prejudice Lysomirski's Complaint against the settling defendants identified in Exhibit B, subject to restoration by any party in the event settlement is not finalized. Lysomirski shall file an Amended Complaint by June 30, 2015, consistent with this Order and Opinion, dropping the settling defendants from the caption and the allegations, but retaining the paragraph numbering of the existing Complaint. Defendants' Answers need not be amended. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-mc-00102-AKH et al. (kko)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vynar v. 4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mykhaylo Vynar
Represented By: Robert Allen Grochow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 4101 Austin Blvd. Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Wall Street Holdings L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of New York Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?