Ancile Investment Company Limited v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
| Ancile Investment Company Limited |
| Archer Daniels Midland Company |
| 1:2008cv09492 |
| November 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
OPINION & ORDER # 103906 re: 124 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Archer Daniels Midland Company: For the foregoing reasons, ADM's motion for attorney's fees is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 1/16/2014) (tn) Modified on 1/28/2014 (ca).
|
|
Filing
121
OPINION & ORDER granting, with prejudice re: 102 MOTION to Dismiss in support of Motion for Determination of Foreign Law and to Dismiss the Amended Complaint with prejucide filed by Archer Daniels Midland Company. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Any pending motions are moot. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 11/29/2012) (cd)
|
|
Filing
79
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Amended Complaint (Dckt. No. 69 ) is granted in its entirety, without prejudice. Briefing and discovery regarding the remaining Brazilian law claim, including briefing and discovery regarding choice-of-law issues, will be set at the conference scheduled for March 9, 2011. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/8/2011) (lnl)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION & ORDER:#98079 For the foregoing reasons, ADM's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens is DENIED; Ancile's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED with leave to renew following the close of discovery; ADM's motion to st rike the Coelho Declaration is DENIED; and ADM's motion for a Rule 56(f) continuance is DENIED. The parties should submit a civil case management plan for Court approval by October 5, 2009. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on September 23, 2009) (mov) Modified on 9/28/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ancile Investment Company Limited v. Archer Daniels Midland Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ancile Investment Company Limited | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Benjamin Teig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Archer Daniels Midland Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
