Steadman v. Mayo et al
Plaintiff: Andre Steadman
Defendant: John Mayo and John Sassai
Case Number: 1:2009cv05154
Filed: June 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Clinton
Presiding Judge: Deborah A. Batts
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 72 Report and Recommendations: that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger, dated September 20, 2013, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED b y the Court in its entirety. Defendant Sassi's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Parties shall submit their Proposed Voir Dire Questions and Proposed Requests to Charge to this Court, in conformity with the Court's Individual Practices , no later than Friday, December 20, 2013. Parties shall file their Joint Pre-Trial Statement ("JPTS") and respective Memoranda of Law addressing the issues raised in the JPTS by December 20, 2013. Responses to the Memoranda of Law shall be submitted by January 17, 2014. There shall be no replies. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close ECF entry 61 in this matter. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 10/30/2013) (tn)
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, Docket Entry No. 38, of United States Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger, dated March 27, 2012, be and the same hereby is APPROVE D, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety; 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint is hereby GRANTED; and 3. Plaintiff Andre Steadman's conspiracy claims are hereby dismissed, with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 5/29/2012) (rjm)
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, you are the plaintiff in the above-captioned case, which has been assigned to this Court for all purposes..all correspondence relating to this case should be directed to the Pro Se Office...the pro se Plaintiff immediately to inform the Court, through the Pro Se Office, of any changes of address.... If you do not comply with Rule 4(m), your case shall be dismissed without further notice. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 6/9/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steadman v. Mayo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Steadman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Sassai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?