Carvel v. Durst et al
Pamela Carvel |
Douglas Durst, Jon Adams, Corbally Gartland and Rapleyea, LLP, Joseph Brasile, Rosenberg & Estes P.C., Dutchess County Commissioner of Finance, Dutchess County Attorney, Jane-Joe Doe 1-20, Doe Corp 1-20, Doe L.L.C. 1-20, Doe L.L.P. 1-20 and Doe Surety Insurance 1-20 |
1:2009cv06733 |
July 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of U.S. |
Richard J. Sullivan |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Motion to Dismiss filed by Dutchess County Attorney, Dutchess County Commissioner of Finance, 21 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Pamela Carvel, 23 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Corbally Gar tland and Rapleyea, LLP, Doe Surety Insurance 1-20, Dutchess County Attorney, Dutchess County Commissioner of Finance, Jane-Joe Doe 1-20, Doe Corp 1-20, Jon Adams, Doe L.L.P. 1-20, Douglas Durst, Doe L.L.C. 1-20, Joseph Brasile, Rosenberg & Estes P.C ., re 29 Report and Recommendations. As set forth above, the Court adopts both R&Rs in their entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss all of Plaintiffs claims. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 9, 21, and 23, and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/24/2014) (cd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.