Novick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Karen Novick |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife Options and Choices Plan No. 512 |
| 1:2009cv06865 |
| August 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, defendants' motion to strike (ECF Dkt. No. 66) is GRANTED, defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF Dkt. No. 48) is DENIED, in part, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (E CF Dkt. No. 54) is accordingly GRANTED, in part. MetLife is to award Ms. Novick SID benefits for the entire twenty-six week period, adjusting for the payments already made, and her LID benefits claim is REMANDED to defendants who must process the application and notify Ms. Novick, in writing, of their decision. (Signed by Judge Richard K. Eaton on 12/17/2012) (djc)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion 14 . The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on Friday, March 18, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 2/10/2011) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
