Merck Eprova AG v. Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, LLC
||Merck Eprova AG
||Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, LLC
||November 20, 2009
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of U.S.
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 31, 2013
OPINION AFTER BENCH TRIAL: THAT, no later than March 15, 2013, Merck shall submit a fee application to the Court, including a sworn declaration providing each attorney's background, experience, and billing rate at the time the work was expended, as well as copies of the attorneys' time sheets. Acella may submit papers opposing the amount of fees requested, though not the imposition of fees themselves, no later than March 31, 2013. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of Merck and to terminate the motion located at docket entry 127. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/31/2013) (cd)
|December 8, 2009
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's December 8, 2009 letter, which requests permission to file (1)a reply brief in support of its oral motion to transfer venue,and(2)a response to the legal and evidentiary materials recently submitted by Plaintiff in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction. The requests are hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall file its reply brief by December 9,2009 and shall file its response to Plaintiffs preliminary-injunction materials by December 11, 2009. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 12/8/2009) (jpo)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?