Redd v. Woughter

Redd v. Woughter

Petitioner:	Sharbu Redd
Respondent:	Carol Woughter
Case Number:	1:2009cv09819
Filed:	November 30, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Oneida
Presiding Judge:	Denny Chin
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2012	Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Redd's petition is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Because Redd has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealabi lity will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253(c)(2). The Court further certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purposes of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/12/2012) (ago)
December 3, 2010	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For reasons further set forth in said Order, the petitioner's motion to stay is denied. The petitioner should submit his reply to the respondent's response to his habeas petition, if any, by January 3, 2011. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close Docket NO. 7. 7 MOTION to Stay terminated. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/2/10) (db)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2012

Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Redd's petition is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Because Redd has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealabi lity will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253(c)(2). The Court further certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purposes of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/12/2012) (ago)

December 3, 2010

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For reasons further set forth in said Order, the petitioner's motion to stay is denied. The petitioner should submit his reply to the respondent's response to his habeas petition, if any, by January 3, 2011. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close Docket NO. 7. 7 MOTION to Stay terminated. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/2/10) (db)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redd v. Woughter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sharbu Redd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Carol Woughter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?