Corporacion Mexicana De Mantenimiento Intergral, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. Pemex-Exploracion Y Produccion
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 27, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AN DENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION re: 89 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award (Renewed) filed by Corporacion Mexicana De Mantenimiento Inte rgral, S. De R.L. De C.V., 83 MOTION to Dismiss Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award filed by Pemex-Exploracion Y Produccion. For the reasons stated in this opinion, I grant COMMISA's renewed motion to confirm the Award, and I deny PEP 39;s motion to dismiss COMMISA's petition. The clerk shall mark the motions (Docs. No. 83 and 89) terminated. Several issues remain before this case can be closed: the amount of the judgment to be entered in COMMISA's favor, whether that ju dgment should reflect COMMISA's obligations under its performance bonds and the judgment in Mexico in favor of PEP against COMMISA's sureties with respect to those bonds, the re-deposit by PEP of a cash deposit in lieu of a supersedeas bond , and any other appropriate matters. These issues can be discussed with me at a conference to be held September 12, 2013, at 3 p.m. Counsel shall confer before the conference and jointly propose, in a single letter to be sent to the court by September 9, 2013, an agenda for the conference and their respective positions on the issues to be discussed. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 8/27/2013) (lmb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?