Giglietti v. Bottalico et al
||Anthony Giglietti, Jr.
||Anthony Bottalico, The Association of Commuter Rail Employees and MTA Metro-North Railroad Company
||May 4, 2010
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Laura Taylor Swain
|Nature of Suit:
||Railway Labor Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 16, 2011
ORDER. The Court finds that there exist no just reasons for delay of entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and hereby directs the Clerk of Court to enter an amended judgment granting Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as to the federal claims, declining to exercise jurisdiction of the state law claims, and remanding this action to state court to the extent that state claims are asserted. The Clerk of Court is further requested to effect the remand to state court promptly. This Order resolves docket entry no. 37. Granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Reconsideration. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/16/11) (rjm)
|May 26, 2011
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #100370 For the forgoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is granted. This Order terminates docket entry no. 22. The pre-trial conference scheduled for June 3, 2011, is cancelled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/26/2011) (jfe) Modified on 5/26/2011 (ajc).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?