Shields v. Murdoch et al
| Gregory L. Shields |
| K. Rupert Murdoch, James R. Murdoch, Lachlan K. Murdoch, Chase Carey, David F. Devoe, Joel Klein, Arthur M. Siskind, Roderick I. Eddington, Andrew S.B. Knight, Thomas J. Perkins, Peter L. Barnes, Jose Maria Aznar, Natalie Bancroft, Kenneth E. Cowley, Viet Dinh and John L. Thorton |
| 1:2011cv04917 |
| July 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: (20 in 1:11-cv-05073-PGG) MOTION to Stay Proceedings. filed by Thomas J. Perkins, Arthur M. Siskind, Kenneth E. Crowley, John L. Thorton, James R. Murdoch, Joel Klein, Natalie Bancroft, Jose Maria Aznar, Lachlan K. Murdoch, Roderick I. Eddington, Paul V. Carlucci, Andrew S.B. Knight, David F. DeVoe, Viet Dinh, K. Rupert Murdoch, Peter L. Barnes, Les Hinton, Chase Carey, News Corporation, (38 in 1:11-cv-05556-PGG) MOTION to Stay Proceedings. filed by T homas J. Perkins, Arthur M. Siskind, James R. Murdoch, Joel Klein, John L. Thornton, Natalie Bancroft, Jose Maria Aznar, Lachlan K. Murdoch, Roderick I. Eddington, Andrew S.B. Knight, David F. DeVoe, Viet Dinh, Kenneth E. Cowley, Peter L. Barnes, Les Hinton, Chase Carey, Keith Rupert Murdoch, News Corporation, (24 in 1:11-cv-04917-PGG) MOTION to Stay Proceedings. filed by Thomas J. Perkins, Arthur M. Siskind, John L. Thorton, James R. Murdoch, Joel Klein, Natalie Bancroft, Jose Maria Azna r, Lachlan K. Murdoch, Roderick I. Eddington, Andrew S.B. Knight, Viet Dinh, Kenneth E. Cowley, David F. Devoe, K. Rupert Murdoch, Peter L. Barnes, Chase Carey, News Corporation. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motions to stay the pro ceedings in Shields and Iron Workers are denied. The Amended Complaint in Stricklin is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Stricklin is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days that properly pleads subject matter jurisdiction. If Stricklin fails to do so, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the Stricklin case. Defendants' motion to stay in Stricklin is denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions. (11-cv-4917, Dkt. No. 24; 11-cv-5073, Dkt. No. 20; 11-cv-5556, Dkt. No. 38) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/18/2012) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
