Rueda v. New York City Human Resources Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Rueda v. New York City Human Resources Administration

Rueda v. New York City Human Resources Administration

Plaintiff:	Paulina Rueda
Defendant:	New York City Human Resources Administration
Case Number:	1:2011cv05248
Filed:	July 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 21, 2017	Filing 151 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 133 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by The City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff's First and Second Causes o f Action and GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Third and Fourth Causes of Action. The Clerks' Office is respectfully directed to close the pending motion at Document 133. The parties are directed to appear for a post-discovery conferen ce on October 11, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 518 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. The parties are further directed to submit a joint letter on or before October 4, 2017, setting forth pro posed trial dates and anticipated length of trial. ( Discovery Conference set for 10/11/2017 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 518, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Vernon S. Broderick.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/21/2017) (rj)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 21, 2017

Filing 151 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 133 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by The City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff's First and Second Causes o f Action and GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Third and Fourth Causes of Action. The Clerks' Office is respectfully directed to close the pending motion at Document 133. The parties are directed to appear for a post-discovery conferen ce on October 11, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 518 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. The parties are further directed to submit a joint letter on or before October 4, 2017, setting forth pro posed trial dates and anticipated length of trial. ( Discovery Conference set for 10/11/2017 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 518, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Vernon S. Broderick.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/21/2017) (rj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rueda v. New York City Human Resources Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paulina Rueda
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Human Resources Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?