Nova Group, Inc v. Universitas Education, LLC
||Nova Group, Inc
||Universitas Education, LLC
||December 1, 2011
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Laura Taylor Swain
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 1, 2021
ORDER terminating 424 Motion for Reconsideration re 424 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 34 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Daniel Carpenter. It is hereby ORDERED, that the above-referenced motions (docket entry nos. 700 in 11-C V1590, and 424 in 11-CV-8726) are hereby TERMINATED for purposes of the Court's docket, without prejudice to reinstatement upon application, upon notice to adverse parties and accompanied by the requisite certification; it is further ORDER ED, that no response to the motions is required unless a reinstatement application is granted, in which case the time to respond of any adverse party will be calculated from the date of service of the order of reinstatement and in accordance wi th Local Civil Rule 6.1 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Furthermore, the Court directs the parties' attention to S.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rules 6.1(b), 7.2, and 12.1. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter a copy of this order in 11-CV1590 and 11-CV-8726. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/1/2021) (va)
|May 16, 2016
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 166 Report and Recommendations. The Court has not received any objections to the Report from either Universitas or Nova, so a review for clear error is appropriate. The Court has reviewed care fully Magistrate Judge Pitman's thorough Report and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Because the Report explicitly states that "[f]ailure to object within fourteen ( 14) days will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review," the parties' failure to object operates as a waiver of objections and appellate review. See Graham v. City of New York, 433 Fed. App'x 657, 658 (2d Cir . 2011). This Memorandum Order Adopting Report and Recommendation resolves docket entry number 173 in 11 CV 1590 and docket entry number 115 in 11 CV 8726. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/16/2016) (spo)
|October 8, 2014
AMENDED ORDER: For the aforementioned reasons, Universitas is granted $1,131,472.84 in attorneys' fees and costs, and $134,015.85 in post-judgment interest against Nova, without prejudice to further interest accruals on unsatisfied amo unts. Universitas' request to reduce the October 5, 2012, attorneys' fee award of $268,810.01 against Nova to judgment is granted. The Clerk of the Court is requested to vacate the judgment entered on October 1, 2014 (docket entry no. 489) and enter a new judgment consistent with this Amended Order. This Amended Order resolves docket numbers 314 and 330. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/8/2014) (ajs)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?