Johnson v. City of New York et al
| Navarro Johnson |
| City of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Mayor Bloomberg and John Doe Corizon Health Services Manager AMKC |
| 1:2012cv04266 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| James C. Francis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER #102898: For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the Report in full as to all of the plaintiffs listed above except Langston and Straker. Those 61 plaintiffs complaints are hereby DISMISSED with leave to file an amended comp laint. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any motion to dismiss pending in the cases listed above, and to close all of the cases except Nos. 12 Civ. 4961 and 12 Civ. 5155. The cases may be reopened without prejudice if a plaintiff files an a mended complaint within 45 days. The Court accepts for filing Langston and Straker's amended complaints. The City's motion to dismiss-No. 12 Civ. 4961 (PAE)(JCF), Dkt. 19; No. 12 Civ. 5155 (PAE)(JCF), Dkt. 24-is denied as moot. Defendants a re directed to respond to the two amended complaint. Finally, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve this Opinion and Order on each of the plaintiffs named in the caption at his address of record. re: (21 in 1:12-cv-04671-PAE-JCF) MOTI ON to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (19 in 1:12-cv-04630-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (18 in 1:12-cv-04346-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04394-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed b y City of New York, (26 in 1:12-cv-04302-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04306-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (19 in 1:12-cv-04532-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (1 6 in 1:12-cv-04275-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04457-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (23 in 1:12-cv-04638-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (16 in 1:12-cv-04382-PAE -JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (24 in 1:12-cv-04266-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (18 in 1:12-cv-04634-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (18 in 1:12-cv-04347-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismis s. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04670-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (16 in 1:12-cv-04274-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04698-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of Ne w York, (19 in 1:12-cv-04517-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04383-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (27 in 1:12-cv-04694-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (18 in 1:12-cv -04396-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (17 in 1:12-cv-04299-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (19 in 1:12-cv-04533-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (8 in 1:12-cv-04207-LAP) MOTION purs uant to Rule 60(b). filed by Lyubov Yefimova, (17 in 1:12-cv-04524-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York, (18 in 1:12-cv-04523-PAE-JCF) MOTION to Dismiss. filed by City of New York. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/11/2013) (ago). Modified on 2/13/2013 (rsh).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
