Allen v. Chanel, Inc.,
| Anu Allen |
| Chanel, Inc., |
| 1:2012cv06758 |
| September 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert P. Patterson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER.the Court VACATES its August 21, 2020 Order (Order, dated Aug. 21, 2020 [dkt. no. 94][Docketed Under Seal]) and its March 10, 2020 Order (Order,dated Mar. 10, 2020 [dkt. no. 92]). The Court DENIES as moot the motion to intervene filed by the E lectronic Frontier Foundation and Professor Volokh (Letter from Daniel L. Schmutter, dated Oct. 28, 2020 [Docketed Under Seal]).The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to unseal this case, including docket entries 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, and 98. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order to Ms. Allen. Ms. Allen shall transmit a copy of this order to any search engine, news outlet, or other domain to which she sent a copy of this Courts March 10, 2020 Order or August 21, 2020 TakedownOrder. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/28/2020)(jus)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER with respect to 86 Motion to Seal Case. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Anu Allen's ("Plaintiff") motion to seal the about the above-captioned matter. (See dkt. no. 86.) Plaintiff, however, did not include with her filing the exhibits to which she cites as support for her motion to seal. Plaintiff is therefore directed to file any exhibits cited as support for her motion by no later than Friday, January 31, 2020. Defendant may file a response by no later than Friday, February 14, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 1/21/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION & ORDER re: 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Chanel, Inc.,.For these reasons herein, Defendant's motion for summary judgment and counterclaim for unjust enrichment [ECF No. 51] are granted. Plaintiff is ordered to turn over $14,940.19 plus accrued interest, and premium payments for five months of COBRA coverage plus interest, in the manner designated by Defendant. Defendant shall, on notice to Plaintiff, submit a proposed judgment with an explanation of the amount of the interest and COBRA payments. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/26/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Chanel, Inc. On September 6, 2012, Plaintiff Anu Allen (Allen) filed this action against her former employer, Chanel, Inc. (Chanel), alleging employment discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. 1981, et seq., the AgeDiscrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. 621 , et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL), N.Y. Exec. Law 290, et seq. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages, including back pay, front pay, and lost benefits, as well as recoupment of her legal costs. On November 12, 20 12, Defendant, based on a Separation and Release Agreement alleged to have been exectuted by the parties, moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief c an be granted or, alternatively, pursuant to Rule 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff submitted answering papers on December 4, 2012. Defendant submitted its reply papers on December 10, 2012. Oral argument was held on December 13, 2012. F or the reasons discussed below, Defendants motion to dismiss is converted to a motion for summary judgment and denied. For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants converted motion for summary judgment isdenied without prejudice. This decision on a Court-converted motion for summary judgment should not be deemed a bar to either party filing a motion for summary judgment at the close of discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 6/4/2013) Copies Sent By Chambers. (rsh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Chanel, Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anu Allen | |
| Represented By: | Christopher H. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chanel, Inc., | |
| Represented By: | Mary Ahrens |
| Represented By: | Lorie Elizabeth Almon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
