Federal Trade Commission v. PCCare247 Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: PCCare247 Inc., PC Care247 Solutions Private Limited, Connexxions Infotech Inc, Connexxions IT Services Private Limited, Vikas Agrawal, Navin Pasari, Anuj Agrawal, Sanjay Agarwalla and Parmeshwar Agrawal
Case Number: 1:2012cv07189
Filed: September 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 100 OPINION & ORDER: The FTC's motion to serve defendants through alternative means is granted. The FTC is granted leave to serve the Summons and Complaint and other documents in these cases on the following defendants in the following manner as set forth herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending in these three cases. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/18/2013) (djc)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 OPINION & ORDER re: 82 MOTION Requesting Permission to Serve Defendants Through Alternative Means. filed by Federal Trade Commission. The FTC's motion to serve defendants through alternative means, to wit, email and Facebook, is granted. The FTC is granted leave to serve motions and other post-complaint documents in this case on defendants in the manner specified herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 82. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/7/2013) (djc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Trade Commission v. PCCare247 Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Represented By: Benjamin Robert Davidson
Represented By: Kelly Ann Horne
Represented By: Colleen Brennan Robbins
Represented By: Christine M. Todaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PCCare247 Inc.
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PC Care247 Solutions Private Limited
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connexxions Infotech Inc
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connexxions IT Services Private Limited
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vikas Agrawal
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navin Pasari
Represented By: Jonathan Andrew Harris
Represented By: Julie Vianne Withers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anuj Agrawal
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanjay Agarwalla
Represented By: Stacey Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parmeshwar Agrawal
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Represented By: Marc Stanley Ullman
Represented By: Jack Wenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?