Federal Trade Commission v. PCCare247 Inc. et al
||Federal Trade Commission
||PCCare247 Inc., PC Care247 Solutions Private Limited, Connexxions Infotech Inc, Connexxions IT Services Private Limited, Vikas Agrawal, Navin Pasari, Anuj Agrawal, Sanjay Agarwalla and Parmeshwar Agrawal
||September 24, 2012
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Paul A. Engelmayer
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 19, 2013
OPINION & ORDER: The FTC's motion to serve defendants through alternative means is granted. The FTC is granted leave to serve the Summons and Complaint and other documents in these cases on the following defendants in the following manner as set forth herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending in these three cases. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/18/2013) (djc)
|March 7, 2013
OPINION & ORDER re: 82 MOTION Requesting Permission to Serve Defendants Through Alternative Means. filed by Federal Trade Commission. The FTC's motion to serve defendants through alternative means, to wit, email and Facebook, is granted. The FTC is granted leave to serve motions and other post-complaint documents in this case on defendants in the manner specified herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 82. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/7/2013) (djc)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?