Levi v. RSM McGladrey, Inc.

Levi v. RSM McGladrey, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Daniel A. Levi
Defendant:	RSM McGladrey, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv08787
Filed:	December 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2016	Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint filed by McGladrey, LLP. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth above, Defendant's Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plai ntiff is directed to file the Fourth Amended Complaint, if he so chooses, by no later than Friday, April 29, 2016. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate McGladrey LLP as a party, and terminate the motion, Doc. 59. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/31/2016) (mro)
September 24, 2014	Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by RSM McGladrey, Inc.. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion to further amend hi s complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. All Title VII, EPA and NYSHRL claims are dismissed, and Plaintiff is denied leave to add H&R Block as a party or to allege claims for statutory penalties under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(A) and (c). Plaintiff is granted leave to interpose a claim against Defendant, in its capacity as planadministrator, to recover benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). To the extent he desires topursue alternative forms of redress, Plaintiff is also granted leave to file ERISA claims of thekind discussed in note 24. Plaintiff is directed to file his Third Amended Complaint by October 31, 2014. The complaint should identify Defendant by its proper name (McGladrey, LLP) and should name Defen dant solely in its capacity as plan administrator. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to (1) update the case caption so that Defendant is properly identified as McGladrey, LLP and (2) terminate the pending motion (Doc. 30). (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/24/2014) (kgo)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2016

Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint filed by McGladrey, LLP. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth above, Defendant's Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plai ntiff is directed to file the Fourth Amended Complaint, if he so chooses, by no later than Friday, April 29, 2016. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate McGladrey LLP as a party, and terminate the motion, Doc. 59. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/31/2016) (mro)

September 24, 2014

Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by RSM McGladrey, Inc.. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion to further amend hi s complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. All Title VII, EPA and NYSHRL claims are dismissed, and Plaintiff is denied leave to add H&R Block as a party or to allege claims for statutory penalties under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(A) and (c). Plaintiff is granted leave to interpose a claim against Defendant, in its capacity as planadministrator, to recover benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). To the extent he desires topursue alternative forms of redress, Plaintiff is also granted leave to file ERISA claims of thekind discussed in note 24. Plaintiff is directed to file his Third Amended Complaint by October 31, 2014. The complaint should identify Defendant by its proper name (McGladrey, LLP) and should name Defen dant solely in its capacity as plan administrator. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to (1) update the case caption so that Defendant is properly identified as McGladrey, LLP and (2) terminate the pending motion (Doc. 30). (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/24/2014) (kgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levi v. RSM McGladrey, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel A. Levi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RSM McGladrey, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?