Laporte v. Keyser

Laporte v. Keyser

Plaintiff:	Hector Laporte
Defendant:	William Keyser
Case Number:	1:2012cv09463
Filed:	December 28, 2012
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Westchester
Presiding Judge:	Frank Maas
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2014	Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: 47 MOTION Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hector Laporte, 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William Keyser. For the foregoing reas ons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket entries 30 and 47. To the extent that Plaintiff wishes to amend his Complaint, he must file a motion to amend no later than October 24, 2014. The motion should include a proposed amended complaint, which shall state with specificity Plaintiff's contemplated cl aims and shall also clearly list all defendants whom Plaintiff seeks to add. Plaintiff's motions shall also indicate whether he has properly exhausted his contemplated claims. If Plaintiff does not file a motion requesting leave to amend his Complaint by October 24, 2014, this case will be closed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/18/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2014

Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: 47 MOTION Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hector Laporte, 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William Keyser. For the foregoing reas ons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket entries 30 and 47. To the extent that Plaintiff wishes to amend his Complaint, he must file a motion to amend no later than October 24, 2014. The motion should include a proposed amended complaint, which shall state with specificity Plaintiff's contemplated cl aims and shall also clearly list all defendants whom Plaintiff seeks to add. Plaintiff's motions shall also indicate whether he has properly exhausted his contemplated claims. If Plaintiff does not file a motion requesting leave to amend his Complaint by October 24, 2014, this case will be closed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/18/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laporte v. Keyser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: William Keyser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hector Laporte
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?