Sutton v. City of Yonkers et al
| Sammel L. Sutton |
| City of Yonkers, County Of Westchester, Santobello and Daugherty |
| 1:2013cv00801 |
| February 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| George B. Daniels |
| Gabriel W. Gorenstein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER for 79 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Sammel L. Sutton, 99 Report and Recommendations: Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's Report and Recommendation is adopted in part. The Plaintiffs motion for attorneys' fees is GRANTED, but only in the amount of $77,980.00 in fees and $1,987.81 in costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 79. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/29/2017) (jwh) Modified on 3/29/2017 (jwh).
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Adopting 34 Report and Recommendations, Motions terminated: 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by County Of Westchester. Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's January 26, 2015 Report and Recommendat ion is adopted in full. Defendant County of Westchester's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the County is hereby DISMISSED from this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 27. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/02/2015) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
