Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rajaratnam

Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Rajarengan Rajaratnam
Case Number: 1:2013cv01894
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: NewYork
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 24, 2018 33 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Craig's motion for contempt is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/24/2018) (mml)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rajaratnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: John Patrick Henderson
Represented By: Joseph G. Sansone
Represented By: Sanjay Wadhwa
Represented By: Matthew James Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rajarengan Rajaratnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?