Cook v. Colvin
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 10, 2015
OPINION & ORDER: On September 26, 2015, Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff counsel's motion for an order seeking fees pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) and 31 U.S.C. § 1 304 be granted. Having received no objections, and finding Judge Ellis's decision to be correct and appropriate, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is directed to grant plaintiff counsel's motion for fees. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 11/10/2015) (kl)
|September 2, 2015
OPINION & ORDER re: 21 Report and Recommendation. On August 14, 2015, Magistrate Judge Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted in part, and that the action be rem anded for further administrative proceedings. Objections to that Report and Recommendation were due 14 days after each party was served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Having received no objections and finding Judge Ellis' decisi on to be correct and appropriate, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part. The action is remanded for further administrative proceedings, consistent with the rationale and recommendation of Judge Ellis. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 9/2/2015) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?