Ebin et al v. Kangadis Food Inc.

Defendant: Kangadis Food Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Ebin and Yeruchum Jenkins
Case Number: 1:2013cv02311
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: Jed S. Rakoff
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ebin et al v. Kangadis Food Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kangadis Food Inc.
Represented By: John Peter McEntee
Represented By: Kevin P. Mulry
Represented By: Michael Alan-herman Schoenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Ebin
Represented By: Joseph Ignatius Marchese
Represented By: Neal Jamison Deckant
Represented By: Scott A. Bursor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yeruchum Jenkins
Represented By: Neal Jamison Deckant
Represented By: Scott A. Bursor
Represented By: Joseph Ignatius Marchese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.