Greater New York Taxi Association et al v. The City of New York et al
| Greater New York Taxi Association and Evgeny Freidman |
| The City of New York, The New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, Michael R. Bloomberg, David Yassky and Does 1-9 |
| 1:2013cv03089 |
| May 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 110 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 111 Motion to Compel. For the reasons discussed above, the defendants' motion to compel (Docket no. 111) and the pla intiffs' motion to compel (Docket no. 110) are both granted in part and denied in part. Within forty-five days of this Order, the plaintiffs shall: Add the four "Freidman Custodians" as document custodians. Respond to Document Re quest Nos. 15, 16, and 19 in the Defendants' Sixth Set of Document Requests with documents dating back to November 8, 2013. Respond to Document Request Nos. 6 and 7 in the Defendants' Seventh Set of Document Requests with documents dati ng back to January 18, 2013. Respond to Document Request Nos. 1 through 6 in the Defendants' Sixth Set of Document Requests, with the caveat that the plaintiffs need not produce physical copies of directives and summonses issued by the TLC. Respond to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 9 in the Defendants' Fourth Set of Interrogatories. Within forty-five days of this Order, the defendants shall: Produce all documents withheld on the basis of deliberative process privilege that imp licate decision-making in individual enforcement actions against the plaintiffs' medallions, and produce a privilege log for any documents the defendants continue to withhold on the basis of deliberative process privilege. Remove the attorn ey-client privilege redactions from the email chains attached as Exhibits K and L to the Declaration of James M. Lemonedes dated April 28, 2017, and produce those email chains to the plaintiffs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 9/11/2017) Copies Transmitted this Date By Chambers. (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
