Reich et al v. Lopez et al
| Otto J Reich and Otto Reich Associates, LLC |
| Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, Pedro Jose Trebbau Lopez and Francisco D'Agostino Casado |
| 1:2013cv05307 |
| July 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
OPINION AND ORDER re: 126 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply Memorandum Of Law in Further Support of Renewed Motion To Dismiss, filed by Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, 110 MOTION to Dismiss the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth C laims in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, 109 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Counts Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth of First Amended Complaint filed by Pedro Jose Treb bau Lopez. For the foregoing reasons, Betancourt's and Trebbau's renewed motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and this action is dismissed as against Defendants Betancourt and Trebbau pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). Betancourt's motion for leave to file a sur-surreply is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 109, 110, and 126. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/30/2015) (kko)
|
|
Filing
164
OPINION AND ORDER re: 64 MOTION for Reconsideration or, in the alternative, for Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Otto Reich Associates, LLC, Otto J Reich, 81 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply Memorandum of Law in Further Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court's August 18, 2014 Opinion, filed by Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, Francisco D'Agostino Casado, Pedro Jose Trebbau Lopez. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for partial reconsideration or, in the alternative, for certification for interlocutory appeal, is DENIED. Defendants' motion to file a sur-reply is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 64 and 81. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/13/2015) (kko) Modified on 4/13/2015 (kko).
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply . filed by Francisco D'Agostino Casado, 31 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. filed by Leopoldo Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, Francisco D 'Agostino Casado, Pedro Jose Trebbau Lopez. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 31) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Claims I and II (RICO) and VII (civil conspiracy) are dismissed. Defendant D' Agostino's motion for leave to file a sur-reply (Docket No. 57) is granted. The parties shall confer on the appropriate scope and schedule for jurisdictional discovery and submit a joint letter to the Court with a proposed schedule on or before September 12, 2014. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Nos. 31 and 57. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/18/2014) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
