O'Jeda et al v. Viacom Inc. et al
| Casey O'Jeda |
| Viacom Inc., MTV Networks Music Production Inc. and MTV Networks Enterprises Inc. |
| 1:2013cv05658 |
| August 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and for Court Authorized Notice, Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and for Court Authorized Notice, Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b)< /I> filed by Casey O'Jeda, Nicole Rosinski. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification of a collective action comprised of "[a]ll current and former of Viacom Inc., MTV Networks Music Production Inc., and/or MTV Net works Enterprises Inc., engaged in an intern program from [the date three years prior to the Court's entry of an order certifying the collective action] through the present" is GRANTED. (Pls.' Mem. Law 2). The Court reserves judgment, however, on approval of Plaintiffs proposed notice and the procedures to be used in connection with the notice, as to which Defendants raise various objections. (Defs.' Mem. Law 21-22). The parties are directed to meet and confer on the languag e of the proposed notice and the proposed procedures and to jointly submit a revised version of the notice and a proposed order to the Court no later than April 25, 2014. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 26. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/4/2014) (mro)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Casey O'Jeda and 38 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Complaint filed by Casey O'Jeda: For the reasons set forth within, Plaintiffs' first motion for leave to am end the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order to reflect a jury trial demand is DENIED substantially for the reasons set forth in Defendants' memorandum of law in opposition to the motion. (Docket No. 29). Plaintiffs' second motion for leave to amend the Complaint to add a new Plaintiff and class action claims under California law is GRANTED as unopposed and substantially for the reasons stated in Plaintiffs' memorandum of law. (Docket No. 39). Plaintiffs shall file their Amended Complaint within one week of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/3/2014) (ab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
