Dempsey v. Vieau et al
| Richard A. Dempsey |
| David P. Vieau and David J. Prystash |
| 1:2013cv06883 |
| September 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for relief from the judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 60 is granted. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their pleading is denied. The Cler k of Court is requested to reinstate the judgment dismissing the Amended Complaint, and reclose the case. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 79. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/15/2016) (cf)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 53 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, filed by David P. Vieau, Jason M. Forcier, John R. Granara III, David J. Prystash. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. This Order resolves docket entry no. 53. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/8/2015) (spo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
